Dear Editor
I have watched with great interest the evolution of the paralegal profession over the course of the last several years. So many issues have arisen that must be addressed. In talking to many paralegals across the state, I conclude that we all want recognition as professionals. There does seem to be strong feelings and differences of opinion as to how best to accomplish that goal. The exempt/non-exempt issue, certification, mcle requirements and licensure/regulation all have significant bearing on our careers.
I personally have been very much against licensure of paralegals; then I read Sally Andress' letter in the last issue of the TPJ. Sally raised important points with respect to the need for self-regulation if we truly wish to be perceived as professionals. I agree whole-heartedly with that perspective, and my viewpoint of licensure has completely turned around.
In my own experience, I far too often come across "paralegals" who have neither the training or experience to warrant that designation, and who are billing clients for their time, when their work is largely clerical rather than substantive. It is my own belief that the public is entitled to certain minimum standards and expectations when paying for services. Webster's defines a professional as "one who has an assured competence in a particular field or occupation."
One of the important things about belonging to and participating in professional organizations is to have a voice in important issues. We in Texas have so often lead the nation in effecting changes in our profession. It is my hope that all Texas paralegals will speak out with respect to the issues with which we are faced, and thus contribute to the continued shaping of our profession.
Sincerely,
Connie L. Gray, CLA
Board Certified Legal Assistant
Civil Trial Law & Personal Injury Trial Law
Texas Board of Legal Specialization