|
|
||||
|
![]() ![]()
|
H O T " C I T E S "
LEGAL
RESEARCH 101: CLASS 7
Shepard’s Citations (Shepardizing) Now that you have located your case on point, how do you determine if it is still good law? You Shepardize!!!! This step is often forgotten in legal research, but it is the most crucial. One of my first research projects involved verifying the status of caselaw listed in a defendant’s answer. I discovered that the case they were citing was overturned, and we won the case because the defendant’s attorney did not take 5 minutes to Shepardize a case. What is Shepard’s Citations (”Shepard’s”) and what
does it do? Shepard’s accomplishes 3 things:
Shepard’s has a separate set of volumes for:
Shepard’s displays two types of citing cases:
HOW TO SHEPARDIZE A CASE
DON’T FORGET TO ALWAYS VERIFY THE STATUS OF A CASE!!!!
Hope of a lifetime may provide some credit By Craig Hackler The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 created a number of provisions designed to lighten the financial burden of higher education. Two new additions to the college-saving arsenal are the Hope Scholarship and the Lifetime Learning credits. The Hope credit is available to assist low- and middle-income families and students pay for post-secondary education. A tax credit can be claimed of up to $1,500 per year per student for each of the first two years of college. This amount consists of 100% of the first $1,000 of eligible expenses and 50% of the second $1,000 of eligible expenses. The Lifetime Learning credit picks up where the Hope credit leaves off. It is available for the remaining years of college, graduate school and classes attended to acquire or improve job skills. For expenses paid there is a $1,000 maximum credit amount each year per family. The credit is calculated as 20% of the first $5,000 of eligible expenses. The credit will be increased to $2,000 (20% of the first $10,000 of expenses) in 2003. Like the Lifetime Learning credit, the Hope credit may be claimed by the student or the parents. However, the Lifetime Learning credit is available per family where the Hope credit is available per student. It is a distinction that is easily overlooked and may be a big difference when it comes to the total amount of potential assistance. Both of these credits are nonrefundable to the taxpayer, that is, the taxpayer can only reduce their tax liability to zero. This restriction may actually keep some taxpayers from using the full amount of the credit, especially if the family is able to claim other types of credits. The ability to claim the Hope and Lifetime Learning credits are phased-out according to level of adjusted gross income (AGI). The phaseout range for a single tax filer is between $40,000 and $50,000, and a joint filer’s phaseout range is between $80,000 and $100,000. Taxpayers whose AGI exceeds these phaseout ranges are not able to utilize these credits. Individuals claiming married filing separately status may not claim the credit(s). Also, these credits cannot be claimed in the year a student receives a distribution from an Education IRA. Qualified expenses are limited to tuition and fees. Unfortunately, room and board, books and supplies are not considered qualified expenses and, therefore, are not covered. The amount of eligible expenses are determined after scholarships and other forms of financial aid that are excludable from the student’s income are taken into account. Of course, this brief article is no substitute for a careful consideration of all of the advantages and disadvantages of this matter in light of your unique personal circumstances. Before implementing an education planning strategy, contact and consult with your Financial Advisor and tax professional.
By Dave Murphy The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled [recently] that legal documents could be e-mailed to an offshore company with no physical address. “When faced with an international e-business scofflaw playing hide-and-seek with the federal court, e-mail may be the only means of effecting service of process,” the court said. “We acknowledge that we tread upon untrodden ground.” The ruling favors the Rio Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada which claimed a Costa Rican online sports book infringed on the hotel’s trademark by operating gambling Web sites similar in name and form to the hotel’s trademark. U.S. District Judge Philip M. Pro had allowed the Las Vegas business to use e-mail to serve legal documents because no physical address was available. The appeals court upheld Judge Pro’s decision, saying it was a reasonable way to inform the Web site operators of legal action and give them the opportunity to respond.
© 2002, Legal Assistants Division State Bar of Texas |
|
Home | About PD | Membership | TPJ Online | Vendors | Links | Contact | Legal Notices
The Paralegal Division of the State Bar
of Texas
P.O. Box 1375 Manchaca, Texas 78652
Telephone: (512) 280-1776 — Fax: (512) 291-1170
Web Hosting & Support — Camden Place Ltd., LLC
Please report problems to Webmaster